The EU Must be Involved in the Crisis in Catalonia

Simon Toubeau

Assistant Professor in Politics and International Relations, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Nottingham

Unless the Catalan and Spanish immediately open channels of dialogue about the constitutional future of Catalonia, the scenes witnessed last Sunday may only be a precursor of things to come. But for this dialogue to take place, the EU must be actively involved.

 

Confrontation

With the instant, world-wide circulation of images of brutal police repression of peaceful voters, the Catalan government’s cause seems to have won favour in the court of European and global public opinion. But it is in fact isolated.

The PP has maintained its hard line, refusing to recognise the exercise or its result. This strategy has been bolstered by King Felipe VI’s intervention which, rather than appeal for national unity, offered a one-side condemnation of the conflict. It is also supported by most other Spanish parties, as well as the editorial line adopted by the main Spanish dailies such as El Pais and El Mundo. Potential allies in other historic regions such as the Basque country have remained remarkably silent.

Outside of Spain, European leaders have either taken a neutral stance, relegating the conflict to an internal matter for Spain, or have offered support to the rule of law.

 

Brinkmanship

The Catalan government’s current strategy is however fraught with risk. First, it does not acknowledge the real divisions that exist within Catalonia about the desirability of independence.

Second, it will force the Spanish state to maintain its course. The courts have already promised to suspend the parliamentary session in which the Catalan government could declare independence. The central government could go further, using the power conferred by Art.155 of the constitution, to ‘take all measures necessary…to protect the general interest’.

This could mean police intervention, the collective arrests of members of the Catalan government, the suspension of the Catalan parliament and government, followed by fresh elections or the imposition of direct rule. If such action were opposed by mass peaceful demonstrations, it could lead to more street-level clashes.

But the central government’ strategy is equally risky. It does nothing to address the growing sources of grievances in Catalonia. Moreover, it is not clear that it could work: the 10,000 policemen deployed across Catalonia last Sunday could not prevent over 2milllion voters from casting their ballot in favour of independence.

 

The duty of the EU

Either scenarios- unilateral declaration of independence or central government repression- would have with serious economic and political ramifications for the EU.

Already, two main Spanish banks- Sabadell and CaixaBank- have chosen to move their seat. With capital flying out of its largest economic region, the Spanish stock exchange has taken a tumble, one that is being closely followed by the falling value of the Euro.  The messy economics of a divorce- especially surrounding the repayment of sovereign debt amassed by the Spanish and Catalan government- could lead to a sudden change in credit ratings, widening spreads on Spanish bonds and the volatility that the Eurozone experienced in 2011-12.

For, these reasons that the EU has the duty to bring the Catalan and Spanish government back from the brink. The EU’s reluctance to engage stems from the fact that these are uncharted waters. The EU has few procedures and instruments for bringing parties to a territorial conflict to the negotiation table. Creativity is therefore required.

 

What is to be done

The first necessary action is for the European Parliament and the Council of Ministers to pass a resolution that condemns the situation and recalls the cardinal values of the rule of law, democracy and minority rights in the European constitutional order. This resolution should receive a full endorsement by Donald Tusk, Jean-Claude Juncker, well as the heads of governments of the leading member-states, including Angela Merkel and Emmanuel Macron

The EU should then offer to act as an impartial mediator in the dialogue. Given the heightened tensions and mutual recriminations, this dialogue cannot be left unmediated. The Catalan government will not accept that the Spanish government take on the role of both an interlocutor and an arbiter.

As a mediator, the EU needs to offer a way out of the conflict. The basic condition for dialogue is a formal renunciation of the unilateral declaration of independence by the Catalan government, in exchange for the right to hold a new legally-sanctioned referendum on independence. In case of a No vote, the Catalan government should then open negotiation for a revision of the Catalan Statute of Autonomy, that offers symbolic recognition of Catalonia’s nationhood and a better fiscal pact.

This offer of mediation needs to be accompanied by the promise that the independence of Catalonia will not be recognised if the referendum is carried out illegally and that the Spanish government will be suspended from the Council of Ministers if it is found to violate civil rights in its suspension of Catalan institutions.

 

The failure to act

Inaction would have devastating repercussions for Catalonia, Spain and the EU.

To force the central government to the negotiation table, Catalan people could deploy their most successful strategy so far: mass protests, general strikes, and wide-spread civil disobedience that would bring the regional and national economy to a standstill and generate further political turmoil.

Or, realizing that negotiation was not forthcoming, the Catalan government could choose to declare independence unilaterally, with all the damaging consequences that this could reap.

Both scenarios would result from the EU’s failure to act.

Follow us
New: Briony Jones on Knowledge for Peace - bringing research, policy and practice together https://t.co/bQlhYh20hY? https://t.co/6PgJZ5XLIq
RT @Dan_Bourchier: This is a fascinating read, interesting discussions on both sides of the ledger about the contentious S.44. What do? https://t.co/LWd2LuQvZw
Today: @MarkEvansACT & @ProfStoker on "Dual Citizenship: Make a Date with Democracy and Let the Public Decide" Is i? https://t.co/vFwK0gBHTF
Today: The Origins, Impact and Significance of 'Wicked Problems' https://t.co/N9hZ2r6HPl - @Kate__Crowley and Bria? https://t.co/AElgBIu4EX
Today: @Dan_Bourchier writes on the urgent need for Northern Territory reform, arguing now is the time for decisive? https://t.co/WCIbxNztNi
Today: How the future of Caribbean sugar will depend on the region's capacity for cooperation? https://t.co/VxLG71xvdb